The statistics
speak for themselves; in general, the US healthcare system is grossly
inefficient and underperforming. Uncovering why is this so, however, is
complicated. Many different causes may factor in to the state of US healthcare.
For example, the US is the only developed, wealthy nation without universal
healthcare coverage. This means that millions of Americans do not have
healthcare access because they either have not been offered healthcare by their
employers or cannot afford the options available to them. Although the ACA
decreased the overall number of uninsured Americans, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that there are still currently 28.2
million Americans under the age of 65 without any type of health insurance coverage
(Thomas, 2017 & CDC, 2017).
The lack of
adequate healthcare coverage affects how, when, and where people seek
healthcare. Rather than receiving early or preventative care for diseases and
health concerns, uninsured individuals are more likely to wait until the
disease or need has progressed to the point that seeking care is absolutely
necessary. They are less likely than insured individuals to have established a
relationship with a primary care provider (PCP), which means they often present
to an urgent care center or emergency room for treatment. Altogether, these
facts mean that, out of perceived necessity, they are seeking the most
expensive treatment option for a potentially advanced illness or disease, when
it could have been potentially more easily and economically had they been able
to seek regular care from a PCP (McWilliams, 2009).
Another
contributing factor to the low efficiency of healthcare in America is its
extremely high cost. The US spends more money per capita on healthcare than any
other developed nation, but the spending lacks efficiency. Roughly 30% of all
medical costs are due to unnecessary, wasteful medical spending. This spending
is partially influenced by patients’ medical preferences and requests; many
patients want to have specific tests and procedures done because they believe
them to be necessary, when the reality is that those tests and procedures may
not be medically indicated in their case. Providers often agree to these
unnecessary expenditures to appease anxious patients or simply save time in
having to explain why the tests are not called for. Physicians sometimes also
order excessive diagnostic testing to avoid being held liable for any missed
diagnoses, even when the patient’s presenting problem would not normally require
extra testing. Finally, sometimes providers order repeat testing for their
patients when the original tests were performed at facilities other than their
own, simply because they feel it would take too much time to track down the patient’s
original results (Sabbatini et al., 2014).
Comments
Post a Comment